Xeon E7540 vs E5-2680

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon E5-2680
2012
8 cores / 16 threads
6.08

E7540 outperforms E5-2680 by 10% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2680 and Xeon E7540 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking998943
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.3110.96
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesXeon (Desktop)no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)no data
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)1 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,723no data
Current price$61 (0x MSRP)$35

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E7540 has 374% better value for money than Xeon E5-2680.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2680 and Xeon E7540 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.27 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache20 MB (shared)18 MB L3 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size435 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature85 °C64 °C
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2680 and Xeon E7540 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1567
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2680 and Xeon E7540. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2680 and Xeon E7540 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Identity Protection-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2680 and Xeon E7540 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2680 and Xeon E7540. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size384 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2680 and Xeon E7540.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2680 6.08
Xeon E7540 6.71
+10.4%

E7540 outperforms E5-2680 by 10% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2680 9405
Xeon E7540 10376
+10.3%

E7540 outperforms E5-2680 by 10% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.08 6.71
Recency 6 March 2012 1 January 2010
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 105 Watt

The Xeon E7540 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2680 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2680 and Xeon E7540, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2680
Xeon E5-2680
Intel Xeon E7540
Xeon E7540

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 105 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

This processor has no user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E7540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2680 or Xeon E7540, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.