Ryzen 5 6600HS vs Xeon E5-2680

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2680
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 130 Watt
6.08
Ryzen 5 6600HS
2022
6 cores / 12 threads, 35 Watt
12.27
+102%

Ryzen 5 6600HS outperforms Xeon E5-2680 by a whopping 102% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2680 and Ryzen 5 6600HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1022587
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.31no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesXeon (Desktop)no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,723no data
Current price$81 (0x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2680 and Ryzen 5 6600HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm6 nm
Die size435 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °C95 °C
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2680 and Ryzen 5 6600HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FP7
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2680 and Ryzen 5 6600HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2680 and Ryzen 5 6600HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2680 and Ryzen 5 6600HS are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2680 and Ryzen 5 6600HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size384 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 660M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2680 and Ryzen 5 6600HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2680 6.08
Ryzen 5 6600HS 12.27
+102%

Ryzen 5 6600HS outperforms Xeon E5-2680 by 102% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2680 9404
Ryzen 5 6600HS 18975
+102%

Ryzen 5 6600HS outperforms Xeon E5-2680 by 102% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Xeon E5-2680 4118
Ryzen 5 6600HS 6157
+49.5%

Ryzen 5 6600HS outperforms Xeon E5-2680 by 50% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Xeon E5-2680 26801
Ryzen 5 6600HS 34414
+28.4%

Ryzen 5 6600HS outperforms Xeon E5-2680 by 28% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Xeon E5-2680 12
Ryzen 5 6600HS 19
+59%

Ryzen 5 6600HS outperforms Xeon E5-2680 by 59% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Xeon E5-2680 1.26
Ryzen 5 6600HS 2.74
+117%

Ryzen 5 6600HS outperforms Xeon E5-2680 by 117% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Xeon E5-2680 0.3
Ryzen 5 6600HS 7.7
+2165%

Ryzen 5 6600HS outperforms Xeon E5-2680 by 2165% in TrueCrypt AES.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.08 12.27
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 35 Watt

The Ryzen 5 6600HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2680 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2680 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 6600HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2680 and Ryzen 5 6600HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2680
Xeon E5-2680
AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS
Ryzen 5 6600HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 113 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 55 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 6600HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2680 or Ryzen 5 6600HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.