Xeon X5687 vs E5-2680 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2680 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads, 120 Watt
11.51
+236%

E5-2680 v4 outperforms X5687 by a whopping 236% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Xeon X5687 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking6241469
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation28.351.23
Market segmentWorkstationServer
SeriesIntel Xeon (Desktop)no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date10 March 2016 (8 years ago)14 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,745$121
Current price$126 (0.1x MSRP)$230 (1.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 has 2205% better value for money than Xeon X5687.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Xeon X5687 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads288
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.86 GHz
Bus support9.6 GT/s / QPIno data
L1 cache448 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache3.5 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache35 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size306 mm2239 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °C80 °C
Number of transistors4700 Million1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Xeon X5687 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1366,LGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Xeon X5687. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching++
PAE46 Bit40 Bit
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Xeon X5687 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Xeon X5687 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Xeon X5687. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TB288 GB
Max memory channels43
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s32 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Xeon X5687.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 11.51
+236%
Xeon X5687 3.43

E5-2680 v4 outperforms X5687 by 236% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 17807
+235%
Xeon X5687 5309

E5-2680 v4 outperforms X5687 by 235% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.51 3.43
Recency 10 March 2016 14 February 2011
Physical cores 14 4
Threads 28 8
Cost $1745 $121
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 130 Watt

The Xeon E5-2680 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5687 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Xeon X5687, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
Xeon E5-2680 v4
Intel Xeon X5687
Xeon X5687

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 3117 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 52 votes

Rate Xeon X5687 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2680 v4 or Xeon X5687, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.