EPYC 7452 vs Xeon E5-2680 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2680 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads, 120 Watt
11.51
EPYC 7452
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 155 Watt
31.00
+169%

EPYC 7452 outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v4 by a whopping 169% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2680 v4 and EPYC 7452 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking624119
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation28.3413.90
Market segmentWorkstationServer
SeriesIntel Xeon (Desktop)AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date10 March 2016 (8 years ago)7 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,745$2,025
Current price$126 (0.1x MSRP)$1827 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 has 104% better value for money than EPYC 7452.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and EPYC 7452 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads2864
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.35 GHz
Bus support9.6 GT/s / QPIno data
L1 cache448 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache3.5 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache35 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size306 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °Cno data
Number of transistors4700 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2680 v4 and EPYC 7452 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011TR4
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and EPYC 7452. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and EPYC 7452 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and EPYC 7452 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and EPYC 7452. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size1.5 TB4 TiB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and EPYC 7452.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 11.51
EPYC 7452 31.00
+169%

EPYC 7452 outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v4 by 169% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 17804
EPYC 7452 47951
+169%

EPYC 7452 outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v4 by 169% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 1010
+4.1%
EPYC 7452 970

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms EPYC 7452 by 4% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 6973
EPYC 7452 7368
+5.7%

EPYC 7452 outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v4 by 6% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.51 31.00
Recency 10 March 2016 7 August 2019
Physical cores 14 32
Threads 28 64
Cost $1745 $2025
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 155 Watt

The EPYC 7452 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2680 v4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2680 v4 and EPYC 7452, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
Xeon E5-2680 v4
AMD EPYC 7452
EPYC 7452

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 3111 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 70 votes

Rate EPYC 7452 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2680 v4 or EPYC 7452, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.