Core 2 Duo T5750 vs Xeon E5-2680 v4
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core 2 Duo T5750 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 689 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.02 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Xeon (Desktop) | Intel Core 2 Duo |
| Power efficiency | 8.81 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell-EP (2016) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| Release date | 20 June 2016 (8 years ago) | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,745 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core 2 Duo T5750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 28 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus type | QPI | no data |
| Bus rate | 2 × 9.6 GT/s | 667 MHz |
| Multiplier | 24 | no data |
| L1 cache | 448 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 3.5 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 35 MB | 2 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 306.18 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 86 °C | 85 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4700 Million | 291 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.075V-1.175V |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core 2 Duo T5750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | FCLGA2011 | PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core 2 Duo T5750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| TSX | + | - |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Flex Memory Access | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | - |
| PAE | 46 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core 2 Duo T5750 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | - |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core 2 Duo T5750 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | - |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core 2 Duo T5750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 1.5 TB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core 2 Duo T5750.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 June 2016 | 1 May 2008 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 2 |
| Threads | 28 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 35 Watt |
Xeon E5-2680 v4 has an age advantage of 8 years, 600% more physical cores and 1300% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.
Core 2 Duo T5750, on the other hand, has 242.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core 2 Duo T5750. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon E5-2680 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Duo T5750 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core 2 Duo T5750, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
