Athlon X2 L310 vs Xeon E5-2680 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Athlon X2 L310 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking632not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.70no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon (Desktop)2x AMD Athlon
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Conesus (2009)
Release date10 March 2016 (8 years ago)10 September 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,745no data
Current price$141 (0.1x MSRP)$9.79

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Athlon X2 L310 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads282
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus support9.6 GT/s / QPI800 MHz
L1 cache448 KB256 KB
L2 cache3.5 MB1 MB
L3 cache35 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size306 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature86 °C95 °C
Number of transistors4700 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Athlon X2 L310 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA2011BGA / 638 lidless micro-PGA
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt13 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Athlon X2 L310. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Virtualization, Enhanced Virus Protection
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
VirusProtectno data+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Athlon X2 L310 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Athlon X2 L310 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Athlon X2 L310. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400no data
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Athlon X2 L310.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 17791
+5308%
Athlon X2 L310 329

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Athlon X2 L310 by 5308% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 1012
+772%
Athlon X2 L310 116

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Athlon X2 L310 by 772% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 6972
+3404%
Athlon X2 L310 199

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Athlon X2 L310 by 3404% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 3707
+276%
Athlon X2 L310 987

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Athlon X2 L310 by 276% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 30922
+1670%
Athlon X2 L310 1747

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Athlon X2 L310 by 1670% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 8286
+857%
Athlon X2 L310 866

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Athlon X2 L310 by 857% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 March 2016 10 September 2009
Physical cores 14 2
Threads 28 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 13 Watt

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Athlon X2 L310. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2680 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon X2 L310 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Athlon X2 L310, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
Xeon E5-2680 v4
AMD Athlon X2 L310
Athlon X2 L310

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 3299 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 7 votes

Rate Athlon X2 L310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2680 v4 or Athlon X2 L310, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.