A8-3850 vs Xeon E5-2680 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2680 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads, 120 Watt
11.50
+652%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms A8-3850 by a whopping 652% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2680 v4 and A8-3850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking6362048
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.882.77
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon (Desktop)A-Series (Desktop)
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)30 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,745no data
Current price$141 (0.1x MSRP)$38

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 has 834% better value for money than A8-3850.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and A8-3850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads284
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus support2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cache448 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache3.5 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache35 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size306.18 mm2228 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °Cno data
Number of transistors4700 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2680 v4 and A8-3850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FM1
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and A8-3850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and A8-3850 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and A8-3850 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and A8-3850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6550D

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and A8-3850.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 11.50
+652%
A8-3850 1.53

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms A8-3850 by 652% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 17792
+654%
A8-3850 2361

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms A8-3850 by 654% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 1014
+217%
A8-3850 320

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms A8-3850 by 217% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 6984
+649%
A8-3850 933

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms A8-3850 by 649% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 3707
+39.9%
A8-3850 2649

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms A8-3850 by 40% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 30922
+224%
A8-3850 9534

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms A8-3850 by 224% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 8286
+106%
A8-3850 4027

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms A8-3850 by 106% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 18
+416%
A8-3850 3

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms A8-3850 by 416% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.50 1.53
Recency 20 June 2016 30 June 2011
Physical cores 14 4
Threads 28 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 100 Watt

Xeon E5-2680 v4 has a 651.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 250% more physical cores and 600% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

A8-3850, on the other hand, has 20% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2680 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-3850 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2680 v4 is a server/workstation processor while A8-3850 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2680 v4 and A8-3850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
Xeon E5-2680 v4
AMD A8-3850
A8-3850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 3373 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 170 votes

Rate A8-3850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2680 v4 or A8-3850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.