Sempron 140 vs Xeon E5-2680 v3

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary Details

Comparing Xeon E5-2680 v3 and Sempron 140 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking707not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation19.35no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014)Sargas (2009−2011)
Release date8 September 2014 (9 years ago)July 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$40
Current price$39 $99 (2.5x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

Xeon E5-2680 v3 and Sempron 140 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads241
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size356 mm2117 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistors5,560 million234 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2680 v3 and Sempron 140 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011AM3
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2680 v3 and Sempron 140. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2680 v3 and Sempron 140 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2680 v3 and Sempron 140 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2680 v3 and Sempron 140. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2680 v3 and Sempron 140.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2680 v3 15244
+3037%
Sempron 140 486

Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Sempron 140 by 3037% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2680 v3 985
+218%
Sempron 140 310

Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Sempron 140 by 218% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2680 v3 6406
+1927%
Sempron 140 316

Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Sempron 140 by 1927% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & Cons Summary


Physical cores 12 1
Threads 24 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 45 Watt

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2680 v3 and Sempron 140. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2680 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Sempron 140 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2680 v3 and Sempron 140, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
Xeon E5-2680 v3
AMD Sempron 140
Sempron 140

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 637 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2680 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 214 votes

Rate Sempron 140 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2680 v3 or Sempron 140, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.