N200 vs Xeon E5-2680 v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2680 v3
2014
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
9.44
+194%

Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms N200 by a whopping 194% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2680 v3 and N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8091611
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency7.4450.63
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)no data
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)1 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2680 v3 and N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)no data
Threads244
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Bus rate9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache30 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nmno data
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistors5,560 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2680 v3 and N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA2011no data
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2680 v3 and N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2680 v3 and N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2680 v3 and N200 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2680 v3 and N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133no data
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2680 v3 and N200.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2680 v3 9.44
+194%
N200 3.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2680 v3 14998
+195%
N200 5092

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.44 3.21
Recency 8 September 2014 1 January 2023
Threads 24 4
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon E5-2680 v3 has a 194.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more threads.

N200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and 1900% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2680 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the N200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2680 v3 is a server/workstation processor while N200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2680 v3 and N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Intel N200
N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 1128 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2680 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 39 votes

Rate N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2680 v3 or N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.