Xeon W-2195 vs E5-2679 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2679 v4
2016
20 cores / 40 threads, 200 Watt
15.80
Xeon W-2195
2017
18 cores / 36 threads, 140 Watt
18.32
+15.9%

Xeon W-2195 outperforms Xeon E5-2679 v4 by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Xeon W-2195 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking448343
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.45
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Xeon W
Power efficiency7.1911.91
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Skylake (server) (2017−2019)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)29 September 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,553

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Xeon W-2195 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads4036
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus typeQPIDMI 3.0
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2523
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache5 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache50 MB24.75 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size456.12 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature85 °C66 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)53 °Cno data
Number of transistors7200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Xeon W-2195 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011-3Socket R4
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt140 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Xeon W-2195. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access--
Demand Based Switching++
PAE46 Bit46 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Xeon W-2195 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Xeon W-2195 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Xeon W-2195. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size1.5 TB512 GB
Max memory channels44
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s85.33 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Xeon W-2195.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4048

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2679 v4 15.80
Xeon W-2195 18.32
+15.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2679 v4 24131
Xeon W-2195 27978
+15.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.80 18.32
Recency 20 June 2016 29 September 2017
Physical cores 20 18
Threads 40 36
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 140 Watt

Xeon E5-2679 v4 has 11.1% more physical cores and 11.1% more threads.

Xeon W-2195, on the other hand, has a 15.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-2195 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2679 v4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Xeon W-2195, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2679 v4
Xeon E5-2679 v4
Intel Xeon W-2195
Xeon W-2195

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 45 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2679 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 30 votes

Rate Xeon W-2195 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2679 v4 or Xeon W-2195, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.