Pentium SU4100 vs Xeon E5-2679 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2679 v4
2016
20 cores / 40 threads, 200 Watt
15.19
+4647%
Pentium SU4100
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.32

Xeon E5-2679 v4 outperforms Pentium SU4100 by a whopping 4647% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Pentium SU4100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4643100
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency7.193.03
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 September 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Pentium SU4100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads402
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier25no data
L1 cacheno data64 KB
L2 cache5 MB2 MB
L3 cache50 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size456.12 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)53 °Cno data
Number of transistors7200 Million410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Pentium SU4100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011-3BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Pentium SU4100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Pentium SU4100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Pentium SU4100 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Pentium SU4100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Pentium SU4100.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2679 v4 15.19
+4647%
Pentium SU4100 0.32

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2679 v4 24131
+4717%
Pentium SU4100 501

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.19 0.32
Recency 20 June 2016 1 September 2009
Physical cores 20 2
Threads 40 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon E5-2679 v4 has a 4646.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium SU4100, on the other hand, has 1900% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2679 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium SU4100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2679 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium SU4100 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Pentium SU4100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2679 v4
Xeon E5-2679 v4
Intel Pentium SU4100
Pentium SU4100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 45 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2679 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 13 votes

Rate Pentium SU4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2679 v4 or Pentium SU4100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.