EPYC 9135 vs Xeon E5-2678 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2678 v3
2015
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
9.27
EPYC 9135
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
36.56
+294%

EPYC 9135 outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 by a whopping 294% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2678 v3 and EPYC 9135 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking82796
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data29.26
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesXeonno data
Power efficiency7.3217.31
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Turin (2024)
Release date2015 (9 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,214

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2678 v3 and EPYC 9135 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2432
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache384 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache3072 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm4 nm
Die size356 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)84 °Cno data
Number of transistors5,560 million16,630 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2678 v3 and EPYC 9135 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketLGA2011-3SP5
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2678 v3 and EPYC 9135. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2678 v3 and EPYC 9135 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2678 v3 and EPYC 9135 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2678 v3 and EPYC 9135. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2678 v3 and EPYC 9135.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes40128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2678 v3 9.27
EPYC 9135 36.56
+294%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2678 v3 14726
EPYC 9135 58070
+294%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.27 36.56
Physical cores 12 16
Threads 24 32
Chip lithography 22 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 200 Watt

Xeon E5-2678 v3 has 66.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9135, on the other hand, has a 294.4% higher aggregate performance score, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9135 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2678 v3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2678 v3 and EPYC 9135, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
Xeon E5-2678 v3
AMD EPYC 9135
EPYC 9135

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2414 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2678 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9135 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2678 v3 or EPYC 9135, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.