Celeron Dual-Core T1500 vs Xeon E5-2673 v4
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E5-2673 v4 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1500 by a whopping 3233% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 696 | 3240 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Xeon E5 | Intel Celeron Dual-Core |
| Power efficiency | 3.76 | 0.43 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| Release date | 20 June 2016 (9 years ago) | 1 May 2008 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2673 v4 and Celeron Dual-Core T1500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 20 (Icosa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 40 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 1.87 GHz |
| Bus type | QPI | no data |
| Bus rate | 2 × 9.6 GT/s | 533 MHz |
| Multiplier | 23 | no data |
| L2 cache | 5 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 50 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 456.12 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 7200 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2673 v4 and Celeron Dual-Core T1500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2673 v4 and Celeron Dual-Core T1500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2673 v4 and Celeron Dual-Core T1500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2673 v4 and Celeron Dual-Core T1500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Maximum memory size | 1,536 GB | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2673 v4 and Celeron Dual-Core T1500.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 12.00 | 0.36 |
| Recency | 20 June 2016 | 1 May 2008 |
| Physical cores | 20 | 2 |
| Threads | 40 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 35 Watt |
Xeon E5-2673 v4 has a 3233.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron Dual-Core T1500, on the other hand, has 285.7% lower power consumption.
The Intel Xeon E5-2673 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E5-2673 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
