Processor N95 vs Xeon E5-2673 V3
Aggregated performance score
Xeon E5-2673 V3 outperforms Processor N95 by a whopping 197% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Processor N95 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 766 | 1521 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Alder Lake-N |
| Architecture codename | Haswell-EP (2014) | Alder Lake-N |
| Release date | 8 September 2014 (9 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Current price | $40 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Processor N95 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 44 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 0.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 30 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 356 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 2,600 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Processor N95 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | 2011-3 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Processor N95. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Processor N95 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Processor N95 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Processor N95. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR42133 MHz Quad-channel | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Processor N95.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.20 | 3.10 |
| Recency | 8 September 2014 | 3 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 4 |
| Threads | 24 | 44 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 15 Watt |
The Xeon E5-2673 V3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N95 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E5-2673 V3 is a server/workstation processor while Processor N95 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Processor N95, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
