Core 2 Quad Q9505S vs Xeon E5-2673 V3
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Core 2 Quad Q9505S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 852 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 8.09 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) | no data |
| Release date | 8 September 2014 (10 years ago) | 1 July 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Core 2 Quad Q9505S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.83 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | no data |
| Bus rate | no data | 1333 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 30 MB (shared) | 6 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 356 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 76 °C |
| Number of transistors | 2,600 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V-1.3625V |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Core 2 Quad Q9505S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | 2011-3 | LGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Core 2 Quad Q9505S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| TSX | + | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Core 2 Quad Q9505S technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Core 2 Quad Q9505S are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Core 2 Quad Q9505S. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 2133 MHz Quad-channel | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Core 2 Quad Q9505S.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 September 2014 | 1 July 2009 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 65 Watt |
Xeon E5-2673 V3 has an age advantage of 5 years, 200% more physical cores, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.
Core 2 Quad Q9505S, on the other hand, has 61.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Core 2 Quad Q9505S. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon E5-2673 V3 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Quad Q9505S is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Core 2 Quad Q9505S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
