Xeon Silver 4214Y vs E5-2670 v3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2670 v3
2014
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
8.87
Xeon Silver 4214Y
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 85 Watt
10.74
+21.1%

Xeon Silver 4214Y outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v3 by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Xeon Silver 4214Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking880745
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.9216.75
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Xeon Silver
Power efficiency6.7411.52
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,589$768

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4214Y has 772% better value for money than Xeon E5-2670 v3.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Xeon Silver 4214Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads2424
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier2322
L1 cache64K (per core)768 KB
L2 cache3 MB12 MB
L3 cache30 MB (shared)16.5 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size306.18 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature85 °C77 °C
Number of transistors4700 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Xeon Silver 4214Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Xeon Silver 4214Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Xeon Silver 4214Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Xeon Silver 4214Y are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Xeon Silver 4214Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size768 GB1 TB
Max memory channels46
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s115.212 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Xeon Silver 4214Y.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4048

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2670 v3 8.87
Xeon Silver 4214Y 10.74
+21.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2670 v3 13581
Xeon Silver 4214Y 16442
+21.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.87 10.74
Recency 8 September 2014 2 April 2019
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 85 Watt

Xeon Silver 4214Y has a 21.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 41.2% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Silver 4214Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2670 v3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Xeon Silver 4214Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Intel Xeon Silver 4214Y
Xeon Silver 4214Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 5518 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2670 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Silver 4214Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2670 v3 or Xeon Silver 4214Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.