Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs Xeon E5-2670 v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2670 v3
2014
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
8.78
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 125 Watt
10.86
+23.7%

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v3 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking813668
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.6828.70
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5AMD Ryzen Threadripper
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date8 September 2014 (9 years ago)31 August 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,589$549
Current price$3059 (1.9x MSRP)$110 (0.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X has 4121% better value for money than Xeon E5-2670 v3.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4 GHz
Bus support2 × 9.6 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)32 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size356 mm2213 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 million9,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011SP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR4 Quad-channel
Maximum memory size768 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels44
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s85.33 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4060

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2670 v3 8.78
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 10.86
+23.7%

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v3 by 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2670 v3 13587
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 16800
+23.6%

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v3 by 24% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2670 v3 930
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 1171
+25.9%

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v3 by 26% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2670 v3 5946
+2.1%
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 5824

Xeon E5-2670 v3 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X by 2% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.78 10.86
Recency 8 September 2014 31 August 2017
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 16
Cost $1589 $549
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 125 Watt

The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2670 v3 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2670 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
Xeon E5-2670 v3
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 5080 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2670 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 122 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2670 v3 or Ryzen Threadripper 1900X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.