Celeron M 383 vs Xeon E5-2670 v3

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron M 383 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking880not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.87no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Celeron M
Power efficiency6.74no data
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,589no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron M 383 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads241
Base clock speed2.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz1 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/s400 MHz
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache30 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm90 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron M 383 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA2011no data
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron M 383. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron M 383 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron M 383 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron M 383. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133no data
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron M 383.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 12 1
Threads 24 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 5 Watt

Xeon E5-2670 v3 has 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 309.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 383, on the other hand, has 2300% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron M 383. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2670 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron M 383 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron M 383, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Intel Celeron M 383
Celeron M 383

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 5540 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2670 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M 383 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2670 v3 or Celeron M 383, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.