Celeron G3950 vs Xeon E5-2670 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2670 v3
2014
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
8.87
+484%

Xeon E5-2670 v3 outperforms Celeron G3950 by a whopping 484% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron G3950 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8782157
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.922.83
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Celeron
Power efficiency6.742.72
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)3 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,589$52

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G3950 has 47% better value for money than Xeon E5-2670 v3.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron G3950 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads242
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeQPIDMI 3.0
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier2330
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache3 MB512 KB
L3 cache30 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size306.18 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature85 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
Number of transistors4700 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron G3950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt51 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron G3950. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron G3950 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron G3950 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron G3950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600
Maximum memory size768 GB64 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 610
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron G3950 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron G3950 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron G3950 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron G3950.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2670 v3 8.87
+484%
Celeron G3950 1.52

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2670 v3 13576
+485%
Celeron G3950 2322

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.87 1.52
Recency 8 September 2014 3 January 2017
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 51 Watt

Xeon E5-2670 v3 has a 483.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

Celeron G3950, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 135.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2670 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3950 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2670 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G3950 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron G3950, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Intel Celeron G3950
Celeron G3950

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 5504 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2670 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Celeron G3950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2670 v3 or Celeron G3950, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.