i5-9600KF vs Xeon E5-2669 V3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2669 V3
2015
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
10.14
+50.9%
Core i5-9600KF
2019
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
6.72

Xeon E5-2669 V3 outperforms Core i5-9600KF by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2669 V3 and Core i5-9600KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7691037
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.63
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i5
Power efficiency8.006.69
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date2015 (9 years ago)8 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$262

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2669 V3 and Core i5-9600KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads246
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data37
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)9 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size356 mm2149 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors2,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2669 V3 and Core i5-9600KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
Socket2011-3FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2669 V3 and Core i5-9600KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2669 V3 and Core i5-9600KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2669 V3 and Core i5-9600KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2669 V3 and Core i5-9600KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4 2133 MHz Quad-channelDDR4-2666
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data41.6 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2669 V3 and Core i5-9600KF.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2669 V3 10.14
+50.9%
i5-9600KF 6.72

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2669 V3 16107
+50.9%
i5-9600KF 10674

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.14 6.72
Physical cores 12 6
Threads 24 6
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon E5-2669 V3 has a 50.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

i5-9600KF, on the other hand, has a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 26.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2669 V3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-9600KF in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2669 V3 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-9600KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2669 V3 and Core i5-9600KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2669 V3
Xeon E5-2669 V3
Intel Core i5-9600KF
Core i5-9600KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 70 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2669 V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1167 votes

Rate Core i5-9600KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2669 V3 or Core i5-9600KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.