Xeon E3-1240 v5 vs E5-2660 v2

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2660 v2
2013
10 cores / 20 threads, 95 Watt
6.63
+27%
Xeon E3-1240 v5
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
5.22

Xeon E5-2660 v2 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v5 by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2660 v2 and Xeon E3-1240 v5 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10321187
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.063.76
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon E3
Power efficiency6.586.15
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Skylake-DT (2015)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)19 October 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$850$282

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 has 83% better value for money than Xeon E5-2660 v2.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2660 v2 and Xeon E3-1240 v5 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads208
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache25 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size160 mm2122 mm2
Maximum core temperature75 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million1,750 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2660 v2 and Xeon E3-1240 v5 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1151,FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2660 v2 and Xeon E3-1240 v5. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2660 v2 and Xeon E3-1240 v5 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX-+
SGXno dataYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2660 v2 and Xeon E3-1240 v5 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2660 v2 and Xeon E3-1240 v5. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600
Maximum memory size768 GB64 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E5-2660 v2 and Xeon E3-1240 v5 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no dataN/A
Max resolution over eDPno dataN/A
Max resolution over DisplayPortno dataN/A
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2660 v2 and Xeon E3-1240 v5 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataN/A
OpenGLno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2660 v2 and Xeon E3-1240 v5.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2660 v2 6.63
+27%
Xeon E3-1240 v5 5.22

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2660 v2 10493
+27.1%
Xeon E3-1240 v5 8254

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2660 v2 444
Xeon E3-1240 v5 1318
+197%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2660 v2 3194
Xeon E3-1240 v5 4329
+35.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.63 5.22
Recency 1 September 2013 19 October 2015
Physical cores 10 4
Threads 20 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 80 Watt

Xeon E5-2660 v2 has a 27% higher aggregate performance score, and 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads.

Xeon E3-1240 v5, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 18.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2660 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1240 v5 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2660 v2 and Xeon E3-1240 v5, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2
Xeon E5-2660 v2
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
Xeon E3-1240 v5

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 313 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2660 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 162 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1240 v5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2660 v2 or Xeon E3-1240 v5, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.