A12-9800 vs Xeon E5-2658 v4

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2658 v4 and A12-9800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	836	1803
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.89	1.59
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Xeon E5	no data
Power efficiency	8.19	3.31
Architecture codename	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date	20 June 2016 (8 years ago)	27 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,832	$139

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2658 v4 has 19% better value for money than A12-9800.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2658 v4 and A12-9800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	14 (Tetradeca-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	28	4
Base clock speed	no data	3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.3 GHz	4.2 GHz
Bus type	QPI	no data
Bus rate	2 × 9.6 GT/s	no data
Multiplier	23	no data
L2 cache	3.5 MB	2048 KB
L3 cache	35 MB	0 KB
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Die size	306.18 mm2	246 mm2
Maximum core temperature	no data	90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	74 °C
Number of transistors	4700 Million	1,178 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2658 v4 and A12-9800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2 (Multiprocessor)	1
Socket	no data	AM4
Power consumption (TDP)	105 Watt	65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2658 v4 and A12-9800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
FMA	-	+
AVX	+	+
FRTC	-	+
FreeSync	-	+
PowerTune	-	+
TrueAudio	-	+
PowerNow	-	+
PowerGating	-	+
VirusProtect	-	+
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
TSX	+	-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2658 v4 and A12-9800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT

+

no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2658 v4 and A12-9800 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

-

+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2658 v4 and A12-9800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	no data	DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size	1,536 GB	no data
Max memory channels	no data	2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	no data	AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core count	no data	8
Enduro	-	+
UVD	-	+
VCE	-	+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2658 v4 and A12-9800 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort	-	+
HDMI	-	+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2658 v4 and A12-9800 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	no data	DirectX® 12
Vulkan	-	+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2658 v4 and A12-9800.

PCIe version	3.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	40	8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	9.43	2.36
Recency	20 June 2016	27 July 2017
Physical cores	14	4
Threads	28	4
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	105 Watt	65 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2658 v4 and A12-9800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---