Ryzen Embedded R2314 vs Xeon E5-2650L
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E5-2650L outperforms Ryzen Embedded R2314 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1716 | 1730 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.26 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 5.25 | 24.07 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) | Picasso (2019−2022) |
| Release date | 6 March 2012 (13 years ago) | 21 June 2022 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $142 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2650L and Ryzen Embedded R2314 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 8 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 20480 KB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | 435 mm2 | 210 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 2,270 million | 4,940 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2650L and Ryzen Embedded R2314 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA2011 | FP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 70 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2650L and Ryzen Embedded R2314. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Flex Memory Access | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2650L and Ryzen Embedded R2314 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2650L and Ryzen Embedded R2314 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2650L and Ryzen Embedded R2314. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 384 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon Vega 6 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2650L and Ryzen Embedded R2314.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.43 | 3.37 |
| Recency | 6 March 2012 | 21 June 2022 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 70 Watt | 15 Watt |
Xeon E5-2650L has a 1.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Ryzen Embedded R2314, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 366.7% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Xeon E5-2650L and AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314.
Be aware that Xeon E5-2650L is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Embedded R2314 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
