Ryzen 5 3500U vs Xeon E5-2650

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2650
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
4.64
+6.4%
Ryzen 5 3500U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.36

Xeon E5-2650 outperforms Ryzen 5 3500U by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2650 and Ryzen 5 3500U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12941359
Place by popularitynot in top-10032
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.34no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency4.6227.51
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$91no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2650 and Ryzen 5 3500U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache20480 KB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size435 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature77 °C105 °C
Number of transistors2,270 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2650 and Ryzen 5 3500U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FP5
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2650 and Ryzen 5 3500U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2650 and Ryzen 5 3500U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2650 and Ryzen 5 3500U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2650 and Ryzen 5 3500U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size384 GB64 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2650 and Ryzen 5 3500U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4012

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2650 4.64
+6.4%
Ryzen 5 3500U 4.36

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2650 7370
+6.3%
Ryzen 5 3500U 6931

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2650 391
Ryzen 5 3500U 862
+120%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2650 2447
Ryzen 5 3500U 2482
+1.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.64 4.36
Recency 6 March 2012 6 January 2019
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon E5-2650 has a 6.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 5 3500U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E5-2650 and Ryzen 5 3500U.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2650 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 3500U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2650 and Ryzen 5 3500U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2650
Xeon E5-2650
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
Ryzen 5 3500U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 178 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 8689 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2650 or Ryzen 5 3500U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.