Xeon X3480 vs E5-2650 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2650 v4
2016
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
8.50
+313%
Xeon X3480
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
2.06

Xeon E5-2650 v4 outperforms Xeon X3480 by a whopping 313% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon X3480 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8971906
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.590.27
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency7.662.05
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Lynnfield (2009−2010)
Release date16 March 2016 (8 years ago)30 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,166$612

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2650 v4 has 859% better value for money than Xeon X3480.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon X3480 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.06 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3.73 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size306.18 mm2296 mm2
Maximum core temperature80 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data73 °C
Number of transistors3,400 million774 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon X3480 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1156,LGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon X3480. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching++
PAE46 Bit36 Bit

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon X3480 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon X3480 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon X3480. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333
Maximum memory size1.5 TB32 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s21 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon X3480.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2650 v4 8.50
+313%
Xeon X3480 2.06

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2650 v4 13503
+313%
Xeon X3480 3273

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.50 2.06
Recency 16 March 2016 30 May 2010
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon E5-2650 v4 has a 312.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon X3480, on the other hand, has 10.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2650 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3480 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon X3480, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
Xeon E5-2650 v4
Intel Xeon X3480
Xeon X3480

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 1696 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2650 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 144 votes

Rate Xeon X3480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2650 v4 or Xeon X3480, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.