Xeon E5472 vs E5-2650 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2650 v4
2016
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
8.83
+497%

E5-2650 v4 outperforms E5472 by a whopping 497% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon E5472 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking8132079
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.260.15
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)no data
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 October 2007 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,166no data
Current price$207 (0.2x MSRP)$269

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2650 v4 has 6740% better value for money than Xeon E5472.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon E5472 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)no data
Threads24no data
Boost clock speed2.2 GHzno data
Bus support2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
L2 cache3 MBno data
L3 cache30 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nmno data
Die size306.18 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature80 °C67 °C
Number of transistors4700 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon E5472 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon E5472. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon E5472 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon E5472. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory size1,536 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon E5472.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2650 v4 8.83
+497%
Xeon E5472 1.48

E5-2650 v4 outperforms E5472 by 497% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2650 v4 13662
+498%
Xeon E5472 2286

E5-2650 v4 outperforms E5472 by 498% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2650 v4 554
+25.9%
Xeon E5472 440

E5-2650 v4 outperforms E5472 by 26% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2650 v4 2679
+90.5%
Xeon E5472 1406

E5-2650 v4 outperforms E5472 by 91% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.83 1.48
Recency 20 June 2016 1 October 2007
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 80 Watt

Xeon E5-2650 v4 has a 496.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 8 years.

Xeon E5472, on the other hand, has 31.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2650 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5472 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon E5472, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
Xeon E5-2650 v4
Intel Xeon E5472
Xeon E5472

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 1405 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2650 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 94 votes

Rate Xeon E5472 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2650 v4 or Xeon E5472, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.