Xeon E-2278GEL vs E5-2650 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2650 v4
2016
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
8.51
+12.4%
Xeon E-2278GEL
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
7.57

Xeon E5-2650 v4 outperforms Xeon E-2278GEL by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon E-2278GEL processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking895971
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.6016.93
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency7.6320.36
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019)
Release date16 March 2016 (8 years ago)11 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,166$519

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E-2278GEL has 551% better value for money than Xeon E5-2650 v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon E-2278GEL basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size306.18 mm2180 mm2
Maximum core temperature80 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon E-2278GEL compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA20111151
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon E-2278GEL. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon E-2278GEL technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon E-2278GEL are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon E-2278GEL. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel UHD Graphics P630

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon E-2278GEL.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2650 v4 8.51
+12.4%
Xeon E-2278GEL 7.57

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2650 v4 13517
+12.4%
Xeon E-2278GEL 12024

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.51 7.57
Recency 16 March 2016 11 June 2019
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 16
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-2650 v4 has a 12.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Xeon E-2278GEL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2650 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E-2278GEL in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Xeon E-2278GEL, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
Xeon E5-2650 v4
Intel Xeon E-2278GEL
Xeon E-2278GEL

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 1677 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2650 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E-2278GEL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2650 v4 or Xeon E-2278GEL, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.