Atom N475 vs Xeon E5-2650 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2650 v4
2016, $1,166
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
7.52
+7420%

Xeon E5-2650 v4 outperforms Atom N475 by a whopping 7420% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11183655
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.75no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Atom
Power efficiency7.69no data
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Pineview (2009−2011)
Release date16 March 2016 (9 years ago)1 June 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,166$75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Atom N475 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads242
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.83 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz1.83 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/s533 MHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size306.18 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature80 °C100 °C
Number of transistors3,400 million123 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Atom N475 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Atom N475. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Atom N475 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Atom N475 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Atom N475. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TB2 GB
Max memory channels41
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel GMA 3150

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Atom N475.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon E5-2650 v4 7.52
+7420%
Atom N475 0.10

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon E5-2650 v4 13283
+7321%
Samples: 602
Atom N475 179
Samples: 7

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.52 0.10
Recency 16 March 2016 1 June 2010
Physical cores 12 1
Threads 24 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon E5-2650 v4 has a 7420% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Atom N475, on the other hand, has 1650% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom N475 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2650 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Atom N475 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
Xeon E5-2650 v4
Intel Atom N475
Atom N475

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2017 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2650 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate Atom N475 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Atom N475, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.