Ryzen 3 5300U vs Xeon E5-2650 v2

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon E5-2650 v2
2013
8 cores / 16 threads
6.34
+1.9%
Ryzen 3 5300U
2021
4 cores / 8 threads
6.22

Xeon E5-2650 v2 outperforms Ryzen 3 5300U by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Ryzen 3 5300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking969981
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money1.36no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Lucienne (Zen 2, Ryzen 5000)
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Lucienne-U (Zen 2)
Release date1 September 2013 (10 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$650no data
Current price$54 (0.1x MSRP)no data

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Technical specs

Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Ryzen 3 5300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm
Die size160 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperature75 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Ryzen 3 5300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FP6
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Ryzen 3 5300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Ryzen 3 5300U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Ryzen 3 5300U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Ryzen 3 5300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR4
Maximum memory size768 GB64 GB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Ryzen 3 5300U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4012

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2650 v2 6.34
+1.9%
Ryzen 3 5300U 6.22

Xeon E5-2650 v2 outperforms Ryzen 3 5300U by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2650 v2 9883
+1.9%
Ryzen 3 5300U 9699

Xeon E5-2650 v2 outperforms Ryzen 3 5300U by 2% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2650 v2 519
Ryzen 3 5300U 1226
+136%

Ryzen 3 5300U outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v2 by 136% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2650 v2 3212
Ryzen 3 5300U 3623
+12.8%

Ryzen 3 5300U outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v2 by 13% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 6.34 6.22
Recency 1 September 2013 12 January 2021
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Ryzen 3 5300U. The differences in performance seem too small.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2650 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 5300U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Ryzen 3 5300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
Xeon E5-2650 v2
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
Ryzen 3 5300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 3844 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2650 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1798 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 5300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2650 v2 or Ryzen 3 5300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.