A12-9800 vs Xeon E5-2650 v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2650 v2
2013
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
6.21
+174%
A12-9800
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.27

Xeon E5-2650 v2 outperforms A12-9800 by a whopping 174% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2650 v2 and A12-9800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10861823
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.461.45
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency6.183.30
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)27 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$650$139

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2650 v2 has 70% better value for money than A12-9800.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2650 v2 and A12-9800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache20 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Die size160 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature75 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2650 v2 and A12-9800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2650 v2 and A12-9800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2650 v2 and A12-9800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2650 v2 and A12-9800 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2650 v2 and A12-9800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data8
Enduro-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2650 v2 and A12-9800 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2650 v2 and A12-9800 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2650 v2 and A12-9800.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes408

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2650 v2 6.21
+174%
A12-9800 2.27

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2650 v2 9865
+173%
A12-9800 3611

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2650 v2 519
A12-9800 696
+34.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2650 v2 3152
+87.4%
A12-9800 1682

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.21 2.27
Recency 1 September 2013 27 July 2017
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E5-2650 v2 has a 173.6% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

A12-9800, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2650 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the A12-9800 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2650 v2 is a server/workstation processor while A12-9800 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2650 v2 and A12-9800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
Xeon E5-2650 v2
AMD A12-9800
A12-9800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4556 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2650 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 197 votes

Rate A12-9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2650 v2 or A12-9800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.