Ryzen 5 1300 vs Xeon E5-2648L v4
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1200 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.45 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Xeon E5 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 9.61 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 20 June 2016 (9 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,544 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2648L v4 and Ryzen 5 1300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 28 | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus type | QPI | no data |
| Bus rate | 2 × 9.6 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 18 | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3.5 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 35 MB | 8192 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 306.18 mm2 | 192 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4700 Million | 4800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2648L v4 and Ryzen 5 1300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2648L v4 and Ryzen 5 1300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2648L v4 and Ryzen 5 1300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2648L v4 and Ryzen 5 1300 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2648L v4 and Ryzen 5 1300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 1,536 GB | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2648L v4 and Ryzen 5 1300.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 14 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 65 Watt |
Xeon E5-2648L v4 has 250% more physical cores.
Ryzen 5 1300, on the other hand, has 15.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon E5-2648L v4 and AMD Ryzen 5 1300. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon E5-2648L v4 is a mobile workstation processor while Ryzen 5 1300 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
