i9-13900 vs Xeon E5-2643 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2643 v4
2016
6 cores / 12 threads, 135 Watt
7.07
Core i9-13900
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
29.57
+318%

Core i9-13900 outperforms Xeon E5-2643 v4 by a whopping 318% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2643 v4 and Core i9-13900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking996144
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.2946.00
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency4.9622.39
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,552$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-13900 has 3466% better value for money than Xeon E5-2643 v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2643 v4 and Core i9-13900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1232
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.5 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier34no data
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size246.24 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature75 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors3200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2643 v4 and Core i9-13900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2643 v4 and Core i9-13900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
SIPP-+
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2643 v4 and Core i9-13900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2643 v4 and Core i9-13900 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2643 v4 and Core i9-13900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1.5 TB192 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 770
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.65 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2643 v4 and Core i9-13900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E5-2643 v4 and Core i9-13900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2643 v4 and Core i9-13900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2643 v4 and Core i9-13900.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2643 v4 7.07
i9-13900 29.57
+318%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2643 v4 11235
i9-13900 46967
+318%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2643 v4 1223
i9-13900 2763
+126%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2643 v4 5916
i9-13900 16611
+181%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.07 29.57
Recency 20 June 2016 4 January 2023
Physical cores 6 24
Threads 12 32
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 125 Watt

i9-13900 has a 318.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and 8% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-13900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2643 v4 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2643 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-13900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2643 v4 and Core i9-13900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2643 v4
Xeon E5-2643 v4
Intel Core i9-13900
Core i9-13900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 112 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2643 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 118 votes

Rate Core i9-13900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2643 v4 or Core i9-13900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.