Performance per price, higher is better.
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 vs E5-2643 v2
Aggregated performance score
Xeon E5-2643 v2
2013
6 cores / 12 threads
5.96
+4.2%
E5-2643 v2 outperforms E5-2630L v3 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
Comparing Xeon E5-2643 v2 and Xeon E5-2630L v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1007 | 1033 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 2.21 | 3.76 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) | Haswell-EP (2014) |
| Release date | 1 September 2013 (10 years old) | 8 September 2014 (9 years old) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,200 | no data |
| Current price | $397 (0.2x MSRP) | $214 |
Value for money
Xeon E5-2630L v3 has 70% better value for money than Xeon E5-2643 v2.
Technical specs
Xeon E5-2643 v2 and Xeon E5-2630L v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 15 MB (shared) | 20 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 160 mm2 | 356 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 74 °C | 60 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 2,600 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2643 v2 and Xeon E5-2630L v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
| Socket | FCLGA2011 | FCLGA2011 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2643 v2 and Xeon E5-2630L v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX | Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | - | - |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Flex Memory Access | - | - |
| Demand Based Switching | + | + |
| PAE | 46 Bit | 46 Bit |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2643 v2 and Xeon E5-2630L v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | + | + |
| Identity Protection | - | - |
| OS Guard | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2643 v2 and Xeon E5-2630L v3 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2643 v2 and Xeon E5-2630L v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866 |
| Maximum memory size | 768 GB | 768 GB |
| Max memory channels | 4 | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 59.7 GB/s | 59 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2643 v2 and Xeon E5-2630L v3.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | 40 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
E5-2643 v2 outperforms E5-2630L v3 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
E5-2643 v2 outperforms E5-2630L v3 by 4% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
E5-2630L v3 outperforms E5-2643 v2 by 37% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
E5-2630L v3 outperforms E5-2643 v2 by 36% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 5.96 | 5.72 |
| Recency | 1 September 2013 | 8 September 2014 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 8 |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 55 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2643 v2 and Xeon E5-2630L v3. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2643 v2 and Xeon E5-2630L v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
