Ryzen 3 3100 vs Xeon E5-2640

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2640
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.96
Ryzen 3 3100
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
7.51
+89.6%

Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 by an impressive 90% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 and Ryzen 3 3100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1425962
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.6633.70
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataMatisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop)
Power efficiency3.9410.93
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)24 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$162$99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 3 3100 has 821% better value for money than Xeon E5-2640.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 and Ryzen 3 3100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rate7.2 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache15360 KB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size435 mm274 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors2,270 million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 and Ryzen 3 3100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Ryzen 3 3100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 and Ryzen 3 3100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Ryzen 3 3100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Ryzen 3 3100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size384 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Ryzen 3 3100.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2640 3.96
Ryzen 3 3100 7.51
+89.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2640 6294
Ryzen 3 3100 11928
+89.5%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2640 451
Ryzen 3 3100 1498
+232%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2640 2299
Ryzen 3 3100 5128
+123%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.96 7.51
Recency 6 March 2012 24 April 2020
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E5-2640 has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Ryzen 3 3100, on the other hand, has a 89.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 3100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2640 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2640 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 3100 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 and Ryzen 3 3100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2640
Xeon E5-2640
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
Ryzen 3 3100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1095 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1704 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2640 or Ryzen 3 3100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.