Xeon E3-1265L v3 vs E5-2640 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2640 v4
2016
10 cores / 20 threads, 90 Watt
7.88
+102%
Xeon E3-1265L v3
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
3.91

Xeon E5-2640 v4 outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v3 by a whopping 102% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Xeon E3-1265L v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9551449
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.760.88
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency8.298.23
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Haswell-WS (2013−2014)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)2 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$939$710

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 has 214% better value for money than Xeon E3-1265L v3.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Xeon E3-1265L v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads208
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 8 GT/s5 GT/s
Multiplier24no data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2.5 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache25 MB8192 KB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size246.24 mm2160 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Number of transistors3200 Million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Xeon E3-1265L v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1150
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Xeon E3-1265L v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-+
SIPP-+
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Xeon E3-1265L v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection-+
OS Guard++
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Xeon E3-1265L v3 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Xeon E3-1265L v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size1.5 TB32 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth68.3 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel Processors
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.2 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Xeon E3-1265L v3 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Xeon E3-1265L v3.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 7.88
+102%
Xeon E3-1265L v3 3.91

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 12514
+101%
Xeon E3-1265L v3 6215

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 1050
Xeon E3-1265L v3 1168
+11.2%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 5633
+58.1%
Xeon E3-1265L v3 3563

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.88 3.91
Recency 20 June 2016 2 June 2013
Physical cores 10 4
Threads 20 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 45 Watt

Xeon E5-2640 v4 has a 101.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E3-1265L v3, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2640 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1265L v3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Xeon E3-1265L v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4
Xeon E5-2640 v4
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
Xeon E3-1265L v3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 965 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2640 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 144 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1265L v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2640 v4 or Xeon E3-1265L v3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.