Ryzen 5 5600X vs Xeon E5-2640 v4

Place in the ranking	943	533
Place by popularity	not in top-100	17
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.66	25.56
Market segment	Server	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Xeon E5	AMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency	8.26	20.06
Architecture codename	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
Release date	20 June 2016 (8 years ago)	5 November 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$939	$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 5600X has 861% better value for money than Xeon E5-2640 v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Ryzen 5 5600X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	10 (Deca-Core)	6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads	20	12
Base clock speed	2.4 GHz	3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.4 GHz	4.6 GHz
Bus type	QPI	no data
Bus rate	2 × 8 GT/s	no data
Multiplier	24	37
L1 cache	no data	64K (per core)
L2 cache	2.5 MB	512K (per core)
L3 cache	25 MB	32 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm, 12 nm
Die size	246.24 mm²	2x 80.7 + 125 (I/O) mm²
Maximum core temperature	76 °C	95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	95 °C
Number of transistors	3200 Million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
Unlocked multiplier	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Ryzen 5 5600X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2 (Multiprocessor)	1
Socket	FCLGA2011	AM4
Power consumption (TDP)	90 Watt	65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Ryzen 5 5600X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® AVX2	MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
TSX	+	-
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	+	no data
PAE	46 Bit	no data
Precision Boost 2	no data	+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Ryzen 5 5600X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data
Secure Key	+	no data
OS Guard	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Ryzen 5 5600X are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Ryzen 5 5600X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133	DDR4
Maximum memory size	1.5 TB	128 GB
Max memory channels	4	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	68.3 GB/s	51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Ryzen 5 5600X.

PCIe version	3.0	4.0
PCI Express lanes	40	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 7.86

Ryzen 5 5600X 13.78
+75.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 12493

Ryzen 5 5600X 21887
+75.2%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 1047

Ryzen 5 5600X 2114
+102%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 5636

Ryzen 5 5600X 8688
+54.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.86	13.78
Recency	20 June 2016	5 November 2020
Physical cores	10	6
Threads	20	12
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	90 Watt	65 Watt

Xeon E5-2640 v4 has 66.7% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads.

Ryzen 5 5600X, on the other hand, has a 75.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 38.5% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 5600X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2640 v4 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2640 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 5600X is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Ryzen 5 5600X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.