EPYC 7301 vs Xeon E5-2640 v4

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon E5-2640 v4
2016
10 cores / 20 threads
7.97
EPYC 7301
2017
16 cores / 32 threads
9.70
+21.7%

EPYC 7301 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v4 by 22% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 v4 and EPYC 7301 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking853718
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money7.961.75
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Naples (2017−2018)
Release date20 June 2016 (7 years ago)29 June 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$939$825
Current price$239 (0.3x MSRP)$1500 (1.8x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 has 355% better value for money than EPYC 7301.

Technical specs

Xeon E5-2640 v4 and EPYC 7301 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2032
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus support2 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cache2.5 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache25 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size246.24 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Number of transistors3200 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 v4 and EPYC 7301 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011TR4
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and EPYC 7301. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 v4 and EPYC 7301 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and EPYC 7301 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and EPYC 7301. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size1.5 TB2 TiB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth68.3 GB/s170.671 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and EPYC 7301.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes40128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 7.97
EPYC 7301 9.70
+21.7%

EPYC 7301 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v4 by 22% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2640 v4 12331
EPYC 7301 14991
+21.6%

EPYC 7301 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v4 by 22% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 7.97 9.70
Recency 20 June 2016 29 June 2017
Physical cores 10 16
Threads 20 32
Cost $939 $825
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 170 Watt

The EPYC 7301 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2640 v4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 v4 and EPYC 7301, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4
Xeon E5-2640 v4
AMD EPYC 7301
EPYC 7301

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 719 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2640 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 22 votes

Rate EPYC 7301 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2640 v4 or EPYC 7301, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.