EPYC 7313P vs Xeon E5-2640 v2

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2640 v2
2013
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
4.96
EPYC 7313P
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
27.19
+448%

EPYC 7313P outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 by a whopping 448% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 v2 and EPYC 7313P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1242181
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.2422.14
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency4.7616.00
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$728$913

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7313P has 1685% better value for money than Xeon E5-2640 v2.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 v2 and EPYC 7313P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate7.2 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache64 KB (per core)1 MB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache20 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm+
Die size160 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature75 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 v2 and EPYC 7313P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011SP3
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 v2 and EPYC 7313P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 v2 and EPYC 7313P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 v2 and EPYC 7313P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 v2 and EPYC 7313P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size768 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 v2 and EPYC 7313P.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes40128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2640 v2 4.96
EPYC 7313P 27.19
+448%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2640 v2 7590
EPYC 7313P 41609
+448%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2640 v2 395
EPYC 7313P 1598
+305%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2640 v2 2377
EPYC 7313P 10851
+356%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.96 27.19
Recency 1 September 2013 12 January 2021
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 155 Watt

Xeon E5-2640 v2 has 63.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7313P, on the other hand, has a 448.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7313P is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2640 v2 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 v2 and EPYC 7313P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
Xeon E5-2640 v2
AMD EPYC 7313P
EPYC 7313P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 354 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2640 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 28 votes

Rate EPYC 7313P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2640 v2 or EPYC 7313P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.