Celeron G1820 vs Xeon E5-2640 v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2640 v2
2013
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
4.78
+343%
Celeron G1820
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 53 Watt
1.08

Xeon E5-2640 v2 outperforms Celeron G1820 by a whopping 343% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Celeron G1820 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12602422
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.290.12
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency4.761.89
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)1 December 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$728$110

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2640 v2 has 975% better value for money than Celeron G1820.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Celeron G1820 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed2 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus rate7.2 GT/s5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size160 mm2177 mm2
Maximum core temperature75 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Celeron G1820 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1150
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt53 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Celeron G1820. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Celeron G1820 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Celeron G1820 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Celeron G1820. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GB32 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s21.3 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel Processors
Max video memoryno data1.7 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Celeron G1820 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+
VGAno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Celeron G1820 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data1920x1080@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno data1920x1200@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Celeron G1820 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data11.1/12
OpenGLno data4.3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Celeron G1820.

PCIe version3.0Up to 3.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2640 v2 4.78
+343%
Celeron G1820 1.08

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2640 v2 7590
+342%
Celeron G1820 1717

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2640 v2 395
Celeron G1820 489
+23.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2640 v2 2377
+185%
Celeron G1820 833

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.78 1.08
Recency 1 September 2013 1 December 2013
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 53 Watt

Xeon E5-2640 v2 has a 342.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Celeron G1820, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 79.2% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2640 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1820 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2640 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G1820 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Celeron G1820, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
Xeon E5-2640 v2
Intel Celeron G1820
Celeron G1820

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 359 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2640 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 165 votes

Rate Celeron G1820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2640 v2 or Celeron G1820, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.