Athlon II X4 638 vs Xeon E5-2640 v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2640 v2
2013
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
4.93
+240%

Xeon E5-2640 v2 outperforms Athlon II X4 638 by a whopping 240% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Athlon II X4 638 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking11422068
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.272.05
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date1 September 2013 (10 years ago)6 February 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$728no data
Current price$187 (0.3x MSRP)$27

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2640 v2 has 60% better value for money than Athlon II X4 638.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Athlon II X4 638 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size160 mm2228 mm2
Maximum core temperature75 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Athlon II X4 638 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FM1
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Athlon II X4 638. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Athlon II X4 638 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Athlon II X4 638 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Athlon II X4 638. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Athlon II X4 638.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2640 v2 4.93
+240%
Athlon II X4 638 1.45

Xeon E5-2640 v2 outperforms Athlon II X4 638 by 240% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2640 v2 7629
+239%
Athlon II X4 638 2250

Xeon E5-2640 v2 outperforms Athlon II X4 638 by 239% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.93 1.45
Recency 1 September 2013 6 February 2012
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

The Xeon E5-2640 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X4 638 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2640 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon II X4 638 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Athlon II X4 638, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
Xeon E5-2640 v2
AMD Athlon II X4 638
Athlon II X4 638

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 332 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2640 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 34 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 638 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2640 v2 or Athlon II X4 638, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.