Xeon E5-2420 vs E5-2630L

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2630L
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 60 Watt
3.34
+5.4%
Xeon E5-2420
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.17

Xeon E5-2630L outperforms Xeon E5-2420 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2630L and Xeon E5-2420 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15721607
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.94
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency5.273.16
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)14 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$390

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2630L and Xeon E5-2420 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1212
Base clock speed2 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate7.2 GT/s7.2 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache15360 KB (shared)15360 KB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size435 mm2294 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,270 million1,270 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2630L and Xeon E5-2420 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2630L and Xeon E5-2420. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access--
Demand Based Switching++

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2630L and Xeon E5-2420 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2630L and Xeon E5-2420 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2630L and Xeon E5-2420. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size384 GB384 GB
Max memory channels43
Maximum memory bandwidth42.6 GB/s32 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2630L and Xeon E5-2420.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4024

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2630L 3.34
+5.4%
Xeon E5-2420 3.17

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2630L 5305
+5.4%
Xeon E5-2420 5033

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2630L 472
+25.5%
Xeon E5-2420 376

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2630L 2935
+59.1%
Xeon E5-2420 1845

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.34 3.17
Recency 6 March 2012 14 May 2012
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon E5-2630L has a 5.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 58.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-2420, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E5-2630L and Xeon E5-2420.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2630L and Xeon E5-2420, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2630L
Xeon E5-2630L
Intel Xeon E5-2420
Xeon E5-2420

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 16 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2630L on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 807 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2630L or Xeon E5-2420, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.