Celeron 1000M vs Xeon E5-2630 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2630 v4
2016
10 cores / 20 threads, 85 Watt
7.55
+979%

Xeon E5-2630 v4 outperforms Celeron 1000M by a whopping 979% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2630 v4 and Celeron 1000M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9782727
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.29no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Celeron
Power efficiency8.131.83
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)20 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$667$86

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2630 v4 and Celeron 1000M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads202
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 8 GT/s5 GT/s
Multiplier22no data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2.5 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache25 MB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size246.24 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data105 °C
Number of transistors3200 Million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2630 v4 and Celeron 1000M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011FCPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2630 v4 and Celeron 1000M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-+
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE46 Bitno data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2630 v4 and Celeron 1000M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2630 v4 and Celeron 1000M are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2630 v4 and Celeron 1000M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TB32 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth68.3 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2630 v4 and Celeron 1000M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2630 v4 and Celeron 1000M.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2630 v4 7.55
+979%
Celeron 1000M 0.70

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2630 v4 11599
+985%
Celeron 1000M 1069

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2630 v4 966
+226%
Celeron 1000M 296

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2630 v4 5310
+943%
Celeron 1000M 509

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.55 0.70
Recency 20 June 2016 20 January 2013
Physical cores 10 2
Threads 20 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-2630 v4 has a 978.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 400% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 1000M, on the other hand, has 142.9% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2630 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2630 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 1000M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2630 v4 and Celeron 1000M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4
Xeon E5-2630 v4
Intel Celeron 1000M
Celeron 1000M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 315 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2630 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 165 votes

Rate Celeron 1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2630 v4 or Celeron 1000M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.