Xeon D-1712TR vs E5-2628L v4
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E5-2628L v4 outperforms Xeon D-1712TR by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1190 | 1394 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.44 | 10.80 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Xeon E5 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 3.55 | 4.90 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 20 June 2016 (9 years ago) | 24 February 2022 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,364 | $263 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon D-1712TR has 2355% better value for money than Xeon E5-2628L v4.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2628L v4 and Xeon D-1712TR basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 4 |
| Threads | 24 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Bus type | QPI | no data |
| Bus rate | 2 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 19 | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 30 MB | 10 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 306.18 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4700 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2628L v4 and Xeon D-1712TR compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FCBGA2227 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 40 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2628L v4 and Xeon D-1712TR. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | + | - |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2628L v4 and Xeon D-1712TR technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2628L v4 and Xeon D-1712TR are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2628L v4 and Xeon D-1712TR. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 1,536 GB | 384 GB |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2628L v4 and Xeon D-1712TR.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | 16 |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 24 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 4 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.30 | 4.64 |
| Recency | 20 June 2016 | 24 February 2022 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 4 |
| Threads | 24 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 40 Watt |
Xeon E5-2628L v4 has a 35.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.
Xeon D-1712TR, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 87.5% lower power consumption.
The Intel Xeon E5-2628L v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon D-1712TR in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E5-2628L v4 is a mobile workstation processor while Xeon D-1712TR is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
