Xeon Silver 4416+ vs E5-2620

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2620
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.33
Xeon Silver 4416+
2023
20 cores / 40 threads, 165 Watt
29.09
+774%

Xeon Silver 4416+ outperforms Xeon E5-2620 by a whopping 774% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2620 and Xeon Silver 4416+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1587152
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.7372.16
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency3.3216.68
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$36$1,186

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4416+ has 4071% better value for money than Xeon E5-2620.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2620 and Xeon Silver 4416+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads1240
Base clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rate7.2 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache15360 KB (shared)37.5 MB
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size435 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature77 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data82 °C
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2620 and Xeon Silver 4416+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA20114677
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2620 and Xeon Silver 4416+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2620 and Xeon Silver 4416+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2620 and Xeon Silver 4416+ are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2620 and Xeon Silver 4416+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4000
Maximum memory size384 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2620 and Xeon Silver 4416+.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4080

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2620 3.33
Xeon Silver 4416+ 29.09
+774%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2620 5293
Xeon Silver 4416+ 46208
+773%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.33 29.09
Recency 6 March 2012 10 January 2023
Physical cores 6 20
Threads 12 40
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 165 Watt

Xeon E5-2620 has 73.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon Silver 4416+, on the other hand, has a 773.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 233.3% more physical cores and 233.3% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Silver 4416+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2620 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2620 and Xeon Silver 4416+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2620
Xeon E5-2620
Intel Xeon Silver 4416+
Xeon Silver 4416+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 517 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Silver 4416 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2620 or Xeon Silver 4416+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.