EPYC Embedded 3101 vs Xeon E5-2620

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2620 and EPYC Embedded 3101 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1587not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.73no data
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC Embedded
Power efficiency3.32no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$36no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2620 and EPYC Embedded 3101 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speed2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus rate7.2 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache15360 KB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size435 mm2213 mm2
Maximum core temperature77 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,270 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2620 and EPYC Embedded 3101 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011AMD BGA SP4r2
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2620 and EPYC Embedded 3101. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2620 and EPYC Embedded 3101 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2620 and EPYC Embedded 3101 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2620 and EPYC Embedded 3101. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size384 GB512 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth42.6 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2620 and EPYC Embedded 3101.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4032

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 March 2012 21 February 2018
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-2620 has 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

EPYC Embedded 3101, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2620 and EPYC Embedded 3101. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2620 and EPYC Embedded 3101, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2620
Xeon E5-2620
AMD EPYC Embedded 3101
EPYC Embedded 3101

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 517 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 3101 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2620 or EPYC Embedded 3101, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.