Xeon E3-1270 v6 vs E5-2620 v4

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon E5-2620 v4
2016
8 cores / 16 threads
5.94
+2.6%
Xeon E3-1270 v6
2017
4 cores / 8 threads
5.79

E5-2620 v4 outperforms E3-1270 v6 by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon E3-1270 v6 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking10161036
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money8.763.77
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Xeon E3
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date20 June 2016 (7 years ago)28 March 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$417$328
Current price$124 (0.3x MSRP)$533 (1.6x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2620 v4 has 132% better value for money than Xeon E3-1270 v6.

Technical specs

Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon E3-1270 v6 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus support2 × 8 GT/s8 GT/s
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache20 MB8 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size246.24 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Number of transistors3200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon E3-1270 v6 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt72 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon E3-1270 v6. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon E3-1270 v6 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPXno data+
Identity Protection-no data
SGXno dataYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon E3-1270 v6 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon E3-1270 v6. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866
Maximum memory size1.5 TB64 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth68.3 GB/s37.5 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon E3-1270 v6 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no dataN/A
Max resolution over eDPno dataN/A
Max resolution over DisplayPortno dataN/A
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon E3-1270 v6 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataN/A
OpenGLno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon E3-1270 v6.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2620 v4 5.94
+2.6%
Xeon E3-1270 v6 5.79

E5-2620 v4 outperforms E3-1270 v6 by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2620 v4 9180
+2.5%
Xeon E3-1270 v6 8956

E5-2620 v4 outperforms E3-1270 v6 by 3% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2620 v4 857
Xeon E3-1270 v6 1450
+69.2%

E3-1270 v6 outperforms E5-2620 v4 by 69% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2620 v4 4610
+2.8%
Xeon E3-1270 v6 4483

E5-2620 v4 outperforms E3-1270 v6 by 3% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 5.94 5.79
Recency 20 June 2016 28 March 2017
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Cost $417 $328
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 72 Watt

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon E3-1270 v6. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon E3-1270 v6, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
Xeon E5-2620 v4
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v6
Xeon E3-1270 v6

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 84 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2620 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 21 vote

Rate Xeon E3-1270 v6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2620 v4 or Xeon E3-1270 v6, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.