Xeon 5130 vs E5-2620 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2620 v4
2016
8 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
5.95
+1067%

E5-2620 v4 outperforms 5130 by a whopping 1067% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon 5130 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking10822820
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.010.74
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2014−2019)Woodcrest (2006)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)June 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$417$16

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2620 v4 has 982% better value for money than Xeon 5130.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon 5130 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cacheno data0 KB
L2 cache2 MB4 MB
L3 cache20 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size246.24 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °C65 °C
Number of transistors3200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon 5130 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
Socketno data771
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon 5130. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon 5130 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon 5130. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2
Maximum memory size1,536 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.3 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon 5130.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2620 v4 5.95
+1067%
Xeon 5130 0.51

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2620 v4 9198
+1057%
Xeon 5130 795

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2620 v4 843
+213%
Xeon 5130 269

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2620 v4 4405
+847%
Xeon 5130 465

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.95 0.51
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E5-2620 v4 has a 1066.7% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon 5130, on the other hand, has 30.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2620 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon 5130 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon 5130, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
Xeon E5-2620 v4
Intel Xeon 5130
Xeon 5130

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 95 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2620 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 4 votes

Rate Xeon 5130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2620 v4 or Xeon 5130, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.