EPYC 9965 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2620 v4 and EPYC 9965 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1125not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.37no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency6.49no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Turin (2024)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$417$14,813

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2620 v4 and EPYC 9965 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)192
Threads16384
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.25 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size246.24 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Number of transistors3200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2620 v4 and EPYC 9965 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA2011SP5
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt500 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2620 v4 and EPYC 9965. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2620 v4 and EPYC 9965 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2620 v4 and EPYC 9965 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2620 v4 and EPYC 9965. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR5
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.3 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2620 v4 and EPYC 9965.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes40128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2016 10 October 2024
Physical cores 8 192
Threads 16 384
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 500 Watt

Xeon E5-2620 v4 has 488.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9965, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2620 v4 and EPYC 9965. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2620 v4 and EPYC 9965, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
Xeon E5-2620 v4
AMD EPYC 9965
EPYC 9965

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 101 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2620 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 31 vote

Rate EPYC 9965 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2620 v4 or EPYC 9965, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.