Ryzen 3 3100 vs Xeon E5-2620 v3

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Ryzen 3 3100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1129	871
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.01	30.97
Market segment	Server	Desktop processor
Series	no data	Matisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop)
Architecture codename	Haswell-EP (2014)	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release date	8 September 2014 (9 years ago)	24 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$99
Current price	$43	$140 (1.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 3 3100 has 929% better value for money than Xeon E5-2620 v3.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Ryzen 3 3100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	6 (Hexa-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	12	8
Base clock speed	2.4 GHz	3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.2 GHz	3.9 GHz
L1 cache	64K (per core)	96K (per core)
L2 cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)
L3 cache	15 MB (shared)	16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	22 nm	7 nm
Die size	356 mm2	74 mm2
Maximum core temperature	73 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	95 °C
Number of transistors	2,600 million	3,800 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
Unlocked multiplier	No	Yes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Ryzen 3 3100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2	1
Socket	FCLGA2011	AM4
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Ryzen 3 3100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® AVX2	DDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI	+	+
FMA	no data	+
AVX	+	+
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
TSX	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	no data
Flex Memory Access	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	+	no data
PAE	46 Bit	no data
Status	Discontinued	no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Ryzen 3 3100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data
Secure Key	+	no data
Identity Protection	-	no data
OS Guard	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Ryzen 3 3100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	no data	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Ryzen 3 3100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866	DDR4
Maximum memory size	768 GB	no data
Max memory channels	4	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	59 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Ryzen 3 3100.

PCIe version	3.0	4.0
PCI Express lanes	40	16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 by 53% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	5.05	7.71
Recency	8 September 2014	24 April 2020
Physical cores	6	4
Threads	12	8
Chip lithography	22 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	65 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Ryzen 3 3100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---