Xeon X5647 vs E5-2609 v3

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon E5-2609 v3
2014
6 cores / 6 threads
2.87
Xeon X5647
2011
4 cores / 8 threads
2.87

Primary Details

Comparing Xeon E5-2609 v3 and Xeon X5647 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking15561557
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.760.67
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014)Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date8 September 2014 (9 years ago)14 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$175
Current price$245 $279 (1.6x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2609 v3 has 13% better value for money than Xeon X5647.

Detailed Specifications

Xeon E5-2609 v3 and Xeon X5647 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads68
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.93 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache15 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size356 mm2239 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °C80 °C
Number of transistors2,600 million1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2609 v3 and Xeon X5647 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1366,LGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2609 v3 and Xeon X5647. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-1.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching++
PAE46 Bit40 Bit
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2609 v3 and Xeon X5647 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2609 v3 and Xeon X5647 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2609 v3 and Xeon X5647. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GB288 GB
Max memory channels43
Maximum memory bandwidth51 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2609 v3 and Xeon X5647.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2609 v3 2.87
Xeon X5647 2.87

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2609 v3 4444
+0.1%
Xeon X5647 4441

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Recency 8 September 2014 14 February 2011
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 130 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E5-2609 v3 and Xeon X5647.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2609 v3 and Xeon X5647, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Intel Xeon X5647
Xeon X5647

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 16 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2609 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 17 votes

Rate Xeon X5647 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2609 v3 or Xeon X5647, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.